This painting, which was too large to fit within one JPEG, was interesting. Other bits of the painting will be reproduced in subsequent entries. The artist was Oscar Oiwa, the title was “Do you like Iraq? (Barbecue)”. Various cartoon characters are having a barbecue, and all the pieces of meat they’re cooking look like countries. I’m sure there are profound political statements being made in this piece, but I can’t say for sure what they are.
The plan for tonight is to get together with some of the old friends from my previous job and go have dinner at one of the nicer restaurants in Tempe. That should be fun.
Finished Strangers Among Us. The book is fairly interesting and reasonably optimistic, even though its conclusions are somewhat suspect because it’s ten years old. I found it interesting that the author, a Latino, a US citizen, and a child of legal Latino immigrants, says that illegal immigrants to the USA can STFU and GTFO. Then again, I’m an educated white male who owns property. As such, some people would say that my opinions on matters of {sex, race, class, economic status} are irrelevant because I belong to a “privileged class”. I do not know what I would say to those people. Since the early 1990s, I have known various people who are not white (inclusive or) not male, and that many of those people have been more skilled in various areas (and been more highly paid) than I will ever be.
This was part of a larger painting that was mostly unremarkable. I don’t know what would possess someone to name bottled pop “Boing”, but here it is.
A painting of a sink full of psychedelic neon things. Good artists can take ordinary objects and make them really neat-looking.
Anyone with at least one dog knows what it’s like at feeding time. The artist deliberately used a naive approach to perspective here, probably to convey something or other. I’m not sure what, but the sheer joy that dogs take in being fed could be seen as naive.
When I first saw this painting, I looked at the extreme right of it, where the man’s body is partially transparent and you can see a woman through him. Then I looked at the extreme left, where the family is. I think it took a good 20 seconds before I noticed the actual subject of the painting. I thought this painting was partially famous, but I can’t find any references to its title. Maybe I should’ve written the title or the artist’s name down, since I probably got a word or two in the title wrong and that’s messing up my Googling.
The Phoenix Art Museum has one of Picasso’s smaller and lesser-known works. I took this (blurry) picture of it sort of out of a sense of duty, not because I thought the picture was insanely great. Whatever.
This particular painting in the Phoenix Art Museum was done sometime in the late 1800s. The whole thing is gigantic (at least 7 feet tall, 6 feet wide) and executed in an almost photorealistic style. It’s an impressive technical achievement, even though the subject is boring. I don’t think anyone would do something like this today, mostly because color photography is now everywhere.
This painting was one of the ones I saw
This is a crop from one of the pieces of art Meghan and I looked at in
Lots of stuff happened yesterday. Went to the art museum with Meghan, saw a bunch of art, some of which was really good. We talked about the art and various other things all through this. I took a bunch of pictures of this art which will be put here and analyzed in later installments. We saw almost all the museum and spent more time there than I’d thought. Then we briefly poked around downtown Tempe, going into some place called “The Hippie Store” or something like that, then getting some coffee, then it was time to go to trivia.


